This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Glasgow, R. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Glasgow, R. E. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Outcomes of and for Diabetes Education Research

AMC Cancer Research Center, Denver, Colorado, 11716 98th Place SW, Vashon, WA 98070 russkpf{at}earthlink.net

PURPOSE

The purpose of this paper is to review outcome measures used to evaluate diabetes self-management education and make recommendations for future research.

METHODS

Three perspectives were used: (1) the frequency with which different measures were collected prior to 1990 was compared with a sample of the 1997 to 1999 literature, (2) a multilevel pyramid model of psychosocial-environmental factors was used to evaluate the level of outcomes assessed, and (3) the RE-AIM evaluation framework was used to assess the public health impact of studies reported in the literature.

RESULTS

Knowledge and HbA₁c measures are often collected to the exclusion of other, possibly more appropriate outcomes. Research has focused almost exclusively on individual or family level outcomes and paid little attention to effects at systems levels, such as neighborhoods, communities, or healthcare systems. More recent studies have been evaluating the reach of interventions, but more practice-oriented research needs to be conducted with representative patients, providers, and settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Much has been learned about the efficacy of diabetes selfmanagement and about measurement issues. Future research should now focus on effectiveness and generalization issues.

The Diabetes Educator, Vol. 25, No. 6 suppl, 74-88 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/014572179902500625


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Cochran and V. S. Conn Meta-analysis of Quality of Life Outcomes Following Diabetes Self-management Training The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2008; 34(5): 815 - 823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. S. Magwood, J. Zapka, and C. Jenkins A Review of Systematic Reviews Evaluating Diabetes Interventions: Focus on Quality of Life and Disparities The Diabetes Educator, March 1, 2008; 34(2): 242 - 265. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Lujan, S. K. Ostwald, and M. Ortiz Promotora Diabetes Intervention for Mexican Americans The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2007; 33(4): 660 - 670. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. I. Taylor, K. M. Oberle, R. A. Crutcher, and P. G. Norton Promoting Health in Type 2 Diabetes: Nurse-Physician Collaboration in Primary Care Biol Res Nurs, January 1, 2005; 6(3): 207 - 215. [Abstract] [PDF]

				American Association of Diabetes Educators Standards for Outcomes Measurement of Diabetes Self-Management Education The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2003; 29(5): 804 - 816. [PDF]

				R. E. Glasgow Translating Research to Practice: Lessons learned, areas for improvement, and future directions Diabetes Care, August 1, 2003; 26(8): 2451 - 2456. [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Amthauer, B. Gagilo, R. E. Glasgow, W. Dortch, and D. K. King Lessons Learned: Patient Strategies for a Type 2 Diabetes Intervention in a Primary Care Setting The Diabetes Educator, July 1, 2003; 29(4): 673 - 681. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. B. Taylor, N. H. Miller, K. R. Reilly, G. Greenwald, D. Cunning, A. Deeter, and L. Abascal Evaluation of a Nurse-Care Management System to Improve Outcomes in Patients With Complicated Diabetes Diabetes Care, April 1, 2003; 26(4): 1058 - 1063. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Riley, R. E. Glasgow, and E. G. Eakin Resources for Health: A Social-Ecological Intervention for Supporting Self-management of Chronic Conditions J Health Psychol, December 1, 2001; 6(6): 693 - 705. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. A. Fain Overview of Outcomes Research: State of the Art The Diabetes Educator, November 1, 2001; 27(6): 752 - 754. [PDF]

				H. G. McKay, D. King, E. G. Eakin, J. R. Seeley, and R. E. Glasgow The Diabetes Network Internet-Based Physical Activity Intervention: A randomized pilot study Diabetes Care, August 1, 2001; 24(8): 1328 - 1334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Coffman Community Partnerships for Parent-to-Parent Support The Diabetes Educator, January 1, 2001; 27(1): 36 - 44. [PDF]

				R. E. Glasgow, R. G. Hiss, R. M. Anderson, N. M. Friedman, R. A. Hayward, D. G. Marrero, C. B. Taylor, and F. Vinicor Report of the Health Care Delivery Work Group: Behavioral research related to the establishment of a chronic disease model for diabetes care Diabetes Care, January 1, 2001; 24(1): 124 - 130. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				R. E. Glasgow, D. J. Toobert, and C. D. Gillette Psychosocial Barriers to Diabetes Self-Management and Quality of Life Diabetes Spectr, January 1, 2001; 14(1): 33 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Tomky, T. Weaver, K. Mulcahy, and M. Peeples Diabetes Education Outcomes: What Educators are Doing The Diabetes Educator, November 1, 2000; 26(6): 951 - 954. [PDF]

				E. G. Fell, R. E. Glasgow, S. Boles, and H. G. McKay Who Participates in Internet-Based Self-Management Programs? A Study Among Novice Computer Users in a Primary Care Setting The Diabetes Educator, September 1, 2000; 26(5): 806 - 811. [Abstract] [PDF]