SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Diabetes Educator
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bonneville, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wentz, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bonneville, M.
Right arrow Articles by Wentz, L.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
Hazardous Substances DB
*METFORMIN HYDROCHLORIDE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Patient Perceptions of Prandial Oral Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes

Miohele Bonneville, RN, MSN, CODE

Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, NewJersey.

Joan Colgin, RN, CDE

Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc, 100 College Road West, Princeton, NJ 08540-7810 joco{at}nnpi.com

Jo Ann Nalesnick, RN, CDE

Joan Perez, RN, MBA, CODE

Lynne Wentz, RN, MHS, CODE

Novo Nordisk Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Princeton, NewJersey.

PURPOSE

This survey was conducted to assess patient perceptions of glycemic control, convenience, and flexibility of a prescribed prandial oral therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Questionnaires distributed by physicians yielded baseline responses from 3696 patients who were beginning repaglinide treatment. Data were analyzed from 1233 respondents who also completed follow-up questionnaires after 4 weeks of treatment.

RESULTS

Among respondents, 60% were taking repaglinide with other antidiabetic agents in combination therapy; 59% were taking metformin, and 24% were taking troglitazone. Most respondents (84%) indicated that they were "satisfied" or "very satisfied" with repaglinide therapy, 92% wished to continue its use, and 60% believed that the treatment had improved their attitude toward taking antidiabetic medication. Patients perceived that fasting blood glucose levels were reduced during treatment, as was the incidence of hyperglycemia. Corresponding changes in perceived frequency of hypoglycemia during repaglinide treatment were minimal.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient perceptions of prandial oral therapy with repaglinide were predominantly positive, due mostly to the perception that glucose control was achieved, with minimal perception of any increase in hypoglycemic episodes.

The Diabetes Educator, Vol. 27, No. 5, 669-677 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/014572170102700507


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement