SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Diabetes Educator
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanfield, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanfield, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hanna, R. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Protocol for Outpatient Screening and Initiation of Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: Impact on Cost and Quality

Jeffrey A. Sanfield, MD, CDE, FACP

St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, Michigan

Marcia Hegstad, CNS, CDE, BC-ADM

61242 Greenwood Drive, South Lyon, Michigan 48178 hegstadm{at}trinity-health.org

Raouf S. Hanna, PhD

PURPOSE

the purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a screening protocol in identifying subjects who would initiate continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and continue the therapy for at least 2 1A years.

METHODS

One hundred four subjects were recruited to participate in a screening protocol involving a mock trial of insulin pump use. Participants who initiated CSII were followed for 21/2 years; those deemed ill suited for CSII used multiple insulin injections. Discontinuation rates, quality of life, and costs were evaluated for subjects using CSII. Baseline and quarterly hemoglobin Al C (Al C) were measured and compared.

RESULTS

The screening protocol identified 37 subjects (35.6%) who were unsuited for CSII. Subjects who initiated CSII reported enhanced quality of life and exhibited a low discontinuation rate (3.3%). No safety issues were encountered. Screening, CSII initiation, and follow-up were accomplished at lower costs per subject ($2431.50) than those reported in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) ($8265.00). Al C was significantly lower over time for subjects receiving CSII compared with those receiving multiple injections.

CONCLUSIONS

A structured screening protocol with trial pump use was effective in identifying individuals who would initiate CSII and continue the therapy for at least 21/2 years.

The Diabetes Educator, Vol. 28, No. 4, 599-607 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/014572170202800414


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement