| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/014572170302900312 © 2003 American Association of Diabetes Educators; Published by SAGE Publications Measuring Perceptions of Diabetes-Related Concepts: A Preliminary StudyDepartment of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, The Towsley Center, Room 1114, Box 0201, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0201 tfitz{at}umich.edu; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor; Geriatric Research, Education, & Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Michigan
Department of Medical Education
Department of Behavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park
Geriatrics Center
Department of Medical Education PURPOSE this pilot study explored health professionals' and patients' perceptions of diabetes through the development of the Diabetes Semantic Differential Scales (DSDS). These scales evaluate the meaning of diabetes-related concepts. METHODS Health professionals (n=39) attending a CME course completed the health professional version of the DSDS. Patients (n=70) completed the patient version of the DSDS. RESULTS The reliability of the DSDS was supported. The scale scores of health professionals, African American patients, and Caucasian patients, examined initially by one-way analyses of variance, showed significant differences among the groups for 4 of the 18 diabetes concepts. Effect sizes were also examined among these groups. For 7 concepts, there was a significant practical difference between the perceptions of the health professionals and the African American patients. For the Caucasian patients, differences were noted for 6 concepts. CONCLUSIONS There are 3 primary inferences from this pilot study. First, health professionals and patients are likely to hold different perceptions of key diabetes concepts. Second, the concepts on which professionals and patients differ are not always what one would expect. Third, health professionals should clarify patients' understanding of diabetes to minimize the potential for miscommunication.
|