| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
DOI: 10.1177/0145721706295021
Trends in the Prescribing of Oral Agents for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the United States, 1990-2001Does Type of Insurance Influence Access to Innovation?From the Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology Research Unit (Dr Skaer, Dr Sclar, Ms Robison), Department of Health Policy and Administration (Dr Skaer, Dr Sclar, Ms Robison), and Department of Statistics (Dr Sclar), Washington State University, Pullman. Correspondence to Tracy L. Skaer, BPharm, PharmD, College of Pharmacy, Washington State University, PO Box 646510, Pullman, WA 99164-6510 (tskaer{at}wsu.edu). Purpose The objectives of the present study were (1) to discern trends in the prescribing of oral pharmacotherapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in the United States during the years 1990 through 2001 and (2) to examine the mediating role of primary health insurance coverage on patients' access to pharmaceutical innovation for the management of type 2 DM. Methods Data from the US National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) for the years 1990 through 2001 were used for this analysis. Results
National estimates of the number of office-based visits documenting a
diagnosis of type 2 DM and the prescribing of an oral medication for glycemic
control increased from 7 871 283 in 1990 to 13 730 886 in 2001 (a 74.4%
increase). A significantly higher proportion of patients covered by private
health insurance were prescribed a newer agent, either alone or as part of a
combination regimen of oral agents, as compared to patients covered by either
Medicare or Medicaid ( Conclusions Over the time frame of 1995 through 2001, access to pharmaceutical innovation for the management of type 2 DM was mediated by the patient's primary source of health insurance coverage. Future research will need to discern the effect of observed differences in the prescribing of oral agents for the management of type 2 DM on both clinical and economic outcomes and, in light of ongoing discussion regarding health care reform in the United States, to foster clinically rational and equitable access to pharmaceutical innovation.
|
2
.001).