| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Efficacy of Meal Replacements Versus a Standard Food-Based Diet for Weight Loss in Type 2 DiabetesA Controlled Clinical TrialFrom the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Center for Human Nutrition, Baltimore, Maryland. Correspondence to Lawrence J. Cheskin, MD, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of International Health, Center for Human Nutrition, 615 North Wolfe Street, Room E2537, Baltimore, MD 21205-2179 (lcheski1{at}jhmi.edu). Purpose The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of a portion-controlled meal replacement diet (PCD) to a standard diet (SD) based on recommendations by the American Diabetes Association in achieving and maintaining weight loss among obese participants with type 2 diabetes. Methods This study is a university-based, controlled clinical trial. Participants were 119 men and women with diabetes with a body mass index between 25 and 40 kg/m2, assigned randomly to one of two 34-week, 75% of predicted energy need diets (portion controlled or standard, self-selected, food based) and then followed by 1-year maintenance. Results
Using intention-to-treat analyses, weight loss at 34 weeks and weight
maintenance at 86 weeks was significantly better on PCD versus SD.
Approximately 40% of the PCD participants lost Conclusions A diet using portion-controlled meal replacements yielded significantly greater initial weight loss and less regain after 1 year of maintenance than a standard, self-selected, food-based diet. As PCDs may help obese patients with type 2 diabetes adhere to a weight control program, diabetes educators may consider recommending them as part of a comprehensive approach to weight control.
The Diabetes Educator, Vol. 34, No. 1,
118-127 (2008) |
||||
5% of their initial weight
compared with 12% of those on the SD. Significant improvements in biochemical
and metabolic measures were observed at 34 weeks in both groups. The retention
rate and self-reported ease of adherence in the PCD group were significantly
higher throughout the study.