SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
The Diabetes Educator
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0145721709333270v1
35/3/439    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuel-Hodge, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bangdiwala, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Samuel-Hodge, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Bangdiwala, S. I.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Diabetes
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

FEATURES

A Randomized Trial of a Church-Based Diabetes Self-management Program for African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes

Carmen D. Samuel-Hodge, PhD, MS, RD, Thomas C. Keyserling, MD, MPH, Sola Park, PhD, Larry F. Johnston, MA, Ziya Gizlice, PhD and Shrikant I. Bangdiwala, PhD

From the Department of Nutrition, Schools of Public Health and Medicine and Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Samuel-Hodge); Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Keyserling); Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Park); Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Mr Johnston, Dr Gizlice); Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Center for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Dr Bangdiwala). Dr Park is currently at Family Health International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.

Correspondence: Thomas C. Keyserling, MD, MPH, CB# 7426, 1700 Martin Luther King Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7426 (jato{at}med.unc.edu).

Purpose

This study developed and tested a culturally appropriate, church-based intervention to improve diabetes self-management.

Research Design and Methods

This was a randomized trial conducted at 24 African American churches in central North Carolina. Churches were randomized to receive the special intervention (SI; 13 churches, 117 participants) or the minimal intervention (MI; 11 churches, 84 participants). The SI included an 8-month intensive phase, consisting of 1 individual counseling visit, 12 group sessions, monthly phone contacts, and 3 encouragement postcards, followed by a 4-month reinforcement phase including monthly phone contacts. The MI received standard educational pamphlets by mail. Outcomes were assessed at 8 and 12 months; the primary outcome was comparison of 8-month A1C levels.

Results

At baseline, the mean age was 59 years, A1C 7.8%, and body mass index 35.0 kg/m2; 64% of participants were female. For the 174 (87%) participants returning for 8-month measures, mean A1C (adjusted for baseline and group randomization) was 7.4% for SI and 7.8% for MI, with a difference of 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1-0.6, P = .009). In a larger model adjusting for additional variables, the difference was 0.5% (95% CI, 0.2-0.7, P < .001). At 12 months, the difference between groups was not significant. Diabetes knowledge and diabetes-related quality of life significantly improved in the SI group compared with the MI group. Among SI participants completing an acceptability questionnaire, intervention components and materials were rated as highly acceptable.

Conclusions

The church-based intervention was well received by participants and improved short-term metabolic control.


This version was published on May 1, 2009

The Diabetes Educator, Vol. 35, No. 3, 439-454 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0145721709333270


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement