This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0145721709335006v1 35/4/641    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lorig, K. Articles by Armas, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lorig, K. Articles by Armas, J. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Community-Based Peer-Led Diabetes Self-management

A Randomized Trial

From the Stanford University School of Medicine.

Correspondence to Philip L. Ritter, Suite 204, 1000 Welch Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304 (philr{at}stanford.edu).

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a community-based diabetes self-management program comparing treatment participants to a randomized usual-care control group at 6 months.

Methods

A total of 345 adults with type 2 diabetes but no criteria for high A1C were randomized to a usual-care control group or 6-week community-based, peer-led diabetes self-management program (DSMP). Randomized participants were compared at 6 months. The DSMP intervention participants were followed for an additional 6 months (12 months total). A1C and body mass index were measured at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. All other data were collected by self-administered questionnaires.

Results

At 6 months, DSMP participants did not demonstrate improvements in A1C as compared with controls. Baseline A1C was much lower than in similar trials. Participants did have significant improvements in depression, symptoms of hypoglycemia, communication with physicians, healthy eating, and reading food labels (P < .01). They also had significant improvements in patient activation and self-efficacy. At 12 months, DSMP intervention participants continued to demonstrate improvements in depression, communication with physicians, healthy eating, patient activation, and self-efficacy (P < .01). There were no significant changes in utilization measures.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that people with diabetes without elevated A1C can benefit from a community-based, peerled diabetes program. Given the large number of people with diabetes and lack of low-cost diabetes education, the DSMP deserves consideration for implementation.

This version was published on July 1, 2009

The Diabetes Educator, Vol. 35, No. 4, 641-651 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0145721709335006


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?