<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com">
<title>The Diabetes Educator recent issues</title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com</link>
<description>The Diabetes Educator RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>The Diabetes Educator</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0145-7217</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/883?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/888?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/893?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/898?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/901?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/915?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/931?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/941?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/959?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/966?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/978?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/986?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/995?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1004?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1014?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1023?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/1031?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/48S?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/53S?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/57S?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/60S?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/64S?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/69S?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/85S?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/683?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/689?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/692?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/709?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/713?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/752?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/761?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/770?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/778?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/789?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/810?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/818?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/836?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/843?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/851?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/857?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/523?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/529?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/532?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/547?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/555?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/565?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/581?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/596?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/612?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/622?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/631?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/641?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/652?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/657?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/664?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://tde.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>The Diabetes Educator</title>
<url>http://tde.sagepub.com:80/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/883?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Thanks for All Your Help!]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/883?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fain, J. A., Peragallo-Dittko, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709355788</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Thanks for All Your Help!]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>883</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>883</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/888?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What Have We Accomplished This Year? What Can We Accomplish in the Future?]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/888?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Draheim, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709353308</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What Have We Accomplished This Year? What Can We Accomplish in the Future?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>890</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>888</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From the President</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/893?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AADE News]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/893?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709355130</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AADE News]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>896</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>893</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>AADE News</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/898?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Looking Ahead]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/898?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709351275</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Looking Ahead]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>898</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>898</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Looking Ahead</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/901?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[THE EDUCATOR'S GUIDE TO DIABETES RESOURCES, 2009]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/901?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709351276</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[THE EDUCATOR'S GUIDE TO DIABETES RESOURCES, 2009]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>910</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>901</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/915?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effective Use of Paired Testing in Type 2 Diabetes: Practical Applications in Clinical Practice]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/915?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this article is to discuss practical approaches to the use
of self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in clinical practice using paired
glucose testing. A rationale for SMBG use and innovative tools for data
collection and analysis are presented.</p>
<p>Method</p>
<p>Health care professionals from various medical specialties collaborated to
review current evidence regarding the value and utility of SMBG and to
formulate professional opinions regarding use of SMBG. The literature review
included key SMBG studies from 2002 through 2009. Established guidelines,
position papers, and other evidence were also reviewed for this report.
Reference Manager Software was used to search ISI Web of Science, PubMed, and
Z39.50 site databases.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Although the utility of SMBG in non&ndash;insulin-treated type 2 diabetes
remains controversial, a recent report from the International Diabetes
Federation recommends SMBG use in this population if it is used to
educate/motivate individuals and/or monitor and adjust therapy. Health care
providers must develop strategies to use SMBG in ways that address these
criteria.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Paired SMBG (testing before/after specific events) promotes diabetes
knowledge and self-management skills and facilitates assessment of the impact
of behavioral changes, medical nutrition therapy, and pharmacologic
interventions on glycemic levels. New tools have been developed to assist in
using paired testing in clinical practice.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parkin, C. G., Hinnen, D., Campbell, R. K., Geil, P., Tetrick, D. L., Polonsky, W. H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709347601</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effective Use of Paired Testing in Type 2 Diabetes: Practical Applications in Clinical Practice]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>927</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>915</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Today's Educator</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/931?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Highlights From the Salary Survey of Diabetes Educators 2008]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/931?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobin, C. T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709350324</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Highlights From the Salary Survey of Diabetes Educators 2008]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>933</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>931</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Professional Development</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/941?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Review of Type 2 Diabetes Management Interventions for Addressing Emotional Well-Being in Latinos]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/941?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this article is (1) to investigate if type 2 diabetes
management programs with Latino participants address emotional well-being in
addition to the standard diabetes self-care behaviors and (2) to describe the
approaches taken to improve psychological and diabetes management
outcomes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Online article and research databases, Internet searches, and review of
article citations were used to identify relevant articles published 1995-2008.
Type 2 diabetes management interventions with a psychological (emotion or
cognitive) component or outcome measure and Latino sample were selected.
Articles were limited to randomized clinical/controlled trials and pre-post
comparative studies.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Thirteen interventions met the inclusion criteria for this review. Eight
studies included emotion outcome measures, and 13 included at least one
cognitive outcome measure. One study was specifically designed to improve
emotional well-being. This study was not targeted for Latinos but did include
Latino participants. A specialized depression case manager and collaborative
care model showed significant improvements in depression and mental
functioning. Psychological improvements were also found in those studies that
assessed cognitive outcomes and were based on cognitive theories. The most
frequent cognitive outcomes assessed were diabetes knowledge, problem solving,
and self-efficacy.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Few type 2 diabetes interventions address emotional well-being in Latinos.
More attention has been directed toward designing culturally sensitive
community-based programs for improving behavior and physical outcomes. Because
some Latino groups believe that negative emotions cause diabetes and because
depression and anxiety are associated with poor self-management, programs
should address emotional well-being as an important aspect of diabetes
management.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Concha, J. B., Kravitz, H. M., Chin, M. H., Kelley, M. A., Chavez, N., Johnson, T. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709344125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Review of Type 2 Diabetes Management Interventions for Addressing Emotional Well-Being in Latinos]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>958</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>941</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Perspectives in Practice</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/959?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Family History of Diabetes, Parental Body Mass Index Predict Obesity in Latino Children]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/959?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study is to examine the association between family
history of diabetes (FHD), body mass index (BMI), and acculturation with
children's BMI status.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Baseline data from a randomized community intervention trial promoting
healthy eating and physical activity were collected in children living in San
Diego, California. A self-administered survey was completed by primary
caregivers at each school assessing maternal diabetes, BMI, acculturation, and
socioeconomic status (SES). Anthropometric data (height, weight, and BMI) from
mothers and children were also collected.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>A total of 812 caregivers completed the baseline survey. Adjusting for
maternal age, marital status, and socioeconomic level, women who had been
diagnosed with diabetes or gestational diabetes or who received diabetes
treatment were significantly more likely to have overweight children. Maternal
BMI was also associated with children's weight. Maternal acculturation level
was marginally associated with children's BMI.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>FHD, gestational diabetes, and BMI were associated with children's
overweight status. More comprehensive interventions are needed to prevent
obesity in Latino children and adults.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Villa-Caballero, L., Arredondo, E. M., Campbell, N., Elder, J. P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709348069</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Family History of Diabetes, Parental Body Mass Index Predict Obesity in Latino Children]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>965</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>959</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/966?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Relationship Between Diabetes Mellitus, Depression, and Missed Appointments in a Low-Income Uninsured Population]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/966?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this project is to identify rates of depression and document
mental health needs of adults with diabetes who obtained care in free clinics.
Data were collected to determine if there is a relationship between diabetes
and depression and missed appointments in a sample of patients who were
low-income, uninsured, and represented a variety of racial groups.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A sample of 183 adults with diabetes participated by completing paper and
computerized questionnaires. Instruments included the Patient Health
Questionnaire 9 (to measure prevalence of depression), the RAND 36 Health
Survey (to measure quality of health), the Audit of Diabetes Dependent Quality
of Life (to measure diabetes-dependent quality of life), and the Diabetes
Empowerment Scale (to measure self-efficacy).</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>The prevalence of depression at a moderate or greater level in the sample
was found to be 30.1%. Levels of quality of health and self-efficacy were
found to be reduced among those with the presence of depression. A significant
increase in the rate of depression was found among those who had attended the
free clinic for a longer period. No significant differences were found in
diabetes-dependent quality of life and missed appointments among those with
depression compared with those without.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Rates of depression among adults with diabetes in a free clinic setting
were found to be comparable with the highest rates reported by other studies
of insured populations. Results of this study support the need to develop
mental health treatment programs for free clinic settings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bowser, D. M., Utz, S., Glick, D., Harmon, R., Rovnyak, V.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709345164</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Relationship Between Diabetes Mellitus, Depression, and Missed Appointments in a Low-Income Uninsured Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>977</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>966</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/978?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diet-Specific Family Support and Glucose Control Among Korean Immigrants With Type 2 Diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/978?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of diet family
support on glucose outcome in Korean immigrants with type 2 diabetes, taking
into consideration patient gender.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A total of 143 Korean immigrants with type 2 diabetes were recruited from a
West Coast Koreatown. On completing questionnaires (demographic, health
history, and the Diabetes Family Behavior Checklist-II [DFBC]), a participant
was given a finger stick blood test for glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C). Body
mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) were calculated after
measurements were taken. Analyses assessed the independent associations of
diet family support, gender, and diet family support by gender interactions
with glucose outcome.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>A higher level of diet family support was significantly associated with
lower A1C, indicating the beneficial effect of diet family support on glucose
control. Although the main effect of gender on A1C was not significant, the
effect of the product term of family support and gender was, indicating that
the significant beneficial impact of diet family support on A1C depends on
gender. The impact is much more pronounced in men (B = -.516) than women (B =
-.038).</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Family support, specific to diet, is significantly associated with glucose
outcomes in Korean immigrants with type 2 diabetes. That is, more perceived
family support was associated with better glucose control. The positive impact
of family support on glucose outcome was significantly stronger in men than in
women, even after other factors were taken into consideration.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Choi, S. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709349220</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diet-Specific Family Support and Glucose Control Among Korean Immigrants With Type 2 Diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>985</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>978</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/986?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Community-Based, Culturally Tailored Behavioral Intervention for Korean Americans With Type 2 Diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/986?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of a culturally tailored
comprehensive type 2 diabetes management intervention for Korean American
immigrants (KAIs) with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A randomized controlled pilot trial with 2 parallel arms (intervention vs
control) with a delayed intervention design was used. A total of 79 KAIs,
recruited from the Baltimore-Washington area, completed baseline, 18-week, and
30-week follow-ups (intervention, n = 40; control, n = 39). All participants
had uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1C &ge;7.5%) at baseline. The
authors' comprehensive, self-help intervention program for type 2 diabetes
management (SHIP-DM) consisted of a 6-week structured psychobehavioral
education, home glucose monitoring with teletransmission, and bilingual nurse
telephone counseling for 24 weeks. The primary outcome of the study was A1C
level, and secondary outcomes included an array of psychobehavioral
variables.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Using analysis of covariance, the findings support that the proposed
intervention was effective in significantly lowering A1C and fasting glucose
and also in improving psychosocial outcomes in the sample. Specifically, the
amount of reduction in A1C among intervention group participants was 1.19% at
18 weeks and 1.31% at 30 weeks, with 10% and 15.5% of the participants
achieving the suggested goal of A1C &lt;7% at 18 and 30 weeks of follow-up,
respectively.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>The results highlight the clinical efficacy of the SHIP-DM intervention
composed of a 6-week education program, self-monitoring, and follow-up
counseling, in terms of maintaining the improved intervention effects obtained
and in terms of glucose control.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kim, M. T., Han, H.-R., Song, H.-J., Lee, J.-E., Kim, J., Ryu, J. P., Kim, K. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709345774</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Community-Based, Culturally Tailored Behavioral Intervention for Korean Americans With Type 2 Diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>994</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>986</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/995?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Dance and Peer Support to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in African American Women]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/995?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this pilot study was to test a dance intervention and
explore the role of peer support to improve the diabetes outcomes of A1C,
weight, body fat, and blood pressure in African American women with type 2
diabetes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>This study was conducted in a community-based outpatient clinic. A mixed
methods design was used. A total of 46 women, 26 to 83 years of age, were
randomized to either the 12-week dance group or usual care group. Both between
group and intraindividual group differences were analyzed from baseline to 12
weeks. Focus group interviews explored the role of peer support through
semistructured discussions for the women enrolled in the dance group.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Results showed significant group mean differences in systolic blood
pressure (BP) and body fat. Paired <I>t</I> tests showed significant
reductions in all the diabetes outcomes for the dance group and significant
increases in glycolated hemoglobin (A1C) and systolic BP for the usual care
group. The emergent themes of the focus groups were that a diabetes diagnosis
was devastating, and changing eating habits and taking medications was often
difficult. Peer support in the dance group was expressed as camaraderie,
enjoyment, and laughter, which fostered attendance.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Dancing 2 times per week for 12 weeks produced significant group
differences in systolic BP and body fat and significant intraindividual
changes. The implications are that dancing in a supportive environment with
peers may be an effective strategy for diabetes educators to help those with
diabetes to become more physically active and improve diabetes outcomes and
overall health.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murrock, C. J., Higgins, P. A., Killion, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:09 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709343322</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Dance and Peer Support to Improve Diabetes Outcomes in African American Women]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1003</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>995</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1004?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Medical Nutrition Therapy Program Improves Perinatal Outcomes in Mexican Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1004?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Diabetes in pregnancy is a major public health problem in Mexico. Nutrition
therapy is an important component of treatment. Intensive nutrition
intervention has not been implemented for Mexican pregnant women with
diabetes. Its effect on different types of diabetes mellitus has not been
studied.</p>
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The authors assessed the effect of a medical nutrition therapy (MNT)
program on perinatal complications in Mexico City.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Quasi-experimental design with a historical control. Women were assigned to
a MNT program (n = 88) and were followed up with every 2 weeks until delivery
(2004-2007). The control group (n = 86) was selected from medical charts
(2001-2003) and the same inclusion criteria were used. In each group, 55% of
women had type 2 diabetes mellitus and 45% had gestational diabetes. The MNT
program included a moderate intake of carbohydrate (40%-45% of total energy)
and reduction in energy intake, capillary glucose self-monitoring, and
education. The control group received usual hospital routine care. Statistical
analysis included descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multivariate
logistic regression (OR, 95% CI) as indicated.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Women in the MNT program had a lower risk of preeclampsia, fewer maternal
hospitalization, and neonatal deaths in both types of diabetes. Low birth
weight was less frequent only in women with gestational diabetes receiving
MNT, while neonatal intensive care unit admissions were lower only in women
with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>An intensive MNT program, including counseling, education, and capillary
glucose self-monitoring, has a positive effect over preeclampsia, maternal
hospitalization, and neonatal death in women with diabetes in pregnancy. MNT
guidelines should be implemented in Mexican health care facilities treating
diabetes in pregnancy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Perichart-Perera, O., Balas-Nakash, M., Parra-Covarrubias, A., Rodriguez-Cano, A., Ramirez-Torres, A., Ortega-Gonzalez, C., Vadillo-Ortega, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709343125</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Medical Nutrition Therapy Program Improves Perinatal Outcomes in Mexican Pregnant Women With Gestational Diabetes and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1013</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1004</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1014?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Barriers to Insulin Injection Therapy: Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1014?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Objective</p>
<p>To compare patients' perceptions of injection-related problems with
clinicians' estimates of those problems.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Data were obtained through 2 Internet surveys, one of US adults
self-identified as taking insulin to treat diabetes and the second of health
care professionals who treat people with diabetes who inject insulin,
including primary care physicians, endocrinologists, and diabetes
educators.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>A substantial majority of patients would like to reduce the number of
injections they take each day; almost half said that they would be more likely
to take their insulin injections regularly if a product were available to ease
the pain. A much smaller proportion of patients reported that (1) injections
were a serious burden, (2) they were dissatisfied with the way they took
insulin, (3) injections had a substantial negative impact on quality of life,
(4) they skipped injections they should take, or (5) injection-related
problems affected the number of injections they were willing to take. Half of
the patients said they mentioned injection-related problems to their provider;
a similar number reported that their providers had not given them a solution
to problems with injection-related pain and bruising. Although awareness of
products to ease injection pain was high among providers (especially diabetes
educators), this information was not effectively transmitted to patients.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Patients should be encouraged to discuss their injection-related concerns,
and providers should regularly ask about injection-related problems. Providers
should offer patients information about tools to reduce injection-related
worries, preferably by having them available to show and demonstrate.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rubin, R. R., Peyrot, M., Kruger, D. F., Travis, L. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709345773</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Barriers to Insulin Injection Therapy: Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1022</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1014</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1023?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Using Meal-Based Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) Data to Guide Dietary Recommendations in Patients With Diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/6/1023?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The purpose of this article is to describe how self-monitoring of blood
glucose (SMBG) data is a useful tool for identifying and managing postprandial
hyperglycemia (PPHG). PPHG and postprandial glucose excursions occur
frequently in patients with diabetes even when hemoglobin A1C is controlled
below 7.0%, and convey increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and
mortality. Consequently, effective management of diabetes must include control
of postprandial glucose levels. Postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) depends on
the composition of meals, specifically the amount of carbohydrates.
Reduced-carbohydrate diets offer short-term improvements in glycemic control
and other metabolic parameters, but await the support of long-term efficacy
and safety studies. Glucose profiling and paired-meal SMBG are useful tools
for detecting PPHG and glucose excursions. They provide immediate feedback to
patients on the effect of foods and meals, thereby allowing appropriate food
and medication adjustments to improve postprandial glycemic control.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jovanovic, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709349587</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Using Meal-Based Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) Data to Guide Dietary Recommendations in Patients With Diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1030</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1023</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/1031?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diabetes Self-management Software/Internet Resources]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/6/1031?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 14:22:10 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709351274</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diabetes Self-management Software/Internet Resources]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>6</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>1033</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>1031</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Industry Update</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/48S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community Health Workers in Diabetes Management and Prevention]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/48S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Association of Diabetes Educators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709339140</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community Health Workers in Diabetes Management and Prevention]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3 Suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>52S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>48S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/53S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diabetic Kidney Disease]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/53S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Association of Diabetes Educators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709339142</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diabetic Kidney Disease]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3 Suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>56S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>53S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/57S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/57S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Association of Diabetes Educators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709339141</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Primary Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3 Suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>59S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/60S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Special Considerations in the Management and Education of Older Persons With Diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/60S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Association of Diabetes Educators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709349592</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Special Considerations in the Management and Education of Older Persons With Diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3 Suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>63S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>60S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/64S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inpatient Glycemic Control]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/64S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Association of Diabetes Educators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709350323</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inpatient Glycemic Control]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3 Suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>68S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>64S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/69S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Pharmacist Scope of Practice, Standards of Practice, and Standards of Professional Performance for Diabetes Educators]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/69S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shane-McWhorter, L., Armor, B., Johnson, J. T., Letassy, N., Reichert, S. L., Sisson, E. M., Hanson, J. B. S., Triplett, C., Vivian, E. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709349590</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Pharmacist Scope of Practice, Standards of Practice, and Standards of Professional Performance for Diabetes Educators]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3 Suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>84S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>69S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/85S?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AADE Guidelines for the Practice of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Training (DSME/T)]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/3_suppl/85S?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[American Association of Diabetes Educators]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:08:41 PST</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709352436</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AADE Guidelines for the Practice of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Training (DSME/T)]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3 Suppl</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>107S</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-11-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>85S</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/683?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Value of Diabetes Education: Is It Cost-Effective?]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/683?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fain, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709349157</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Value of Diabetes Education: Is It Cost-Effective?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>683</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>683</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/689?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Health Care Reform: AADE Outlines the Issues]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/689?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Draheim, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709349227</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Health Care Reform: AADE Outlines the Issues]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>690</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>689</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From the President</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/692?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AADE News]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/692?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709348184</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AADE News]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>705</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>692</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>AADE News</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/709?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Looking Ahead]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/709?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Looking Ahead]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>710</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>709</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Looking Ahead</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/713?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Development of a DiaBEATes Nurse Champion Program]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/713?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>This article shares an innovative educational practice for increasing the
knowledge base of direct-care registered nurses related to diabetes
management. Outcome data include quantitative analysis of test scores,
qualitative responses of changes in practice, and participation in monthly
diabetes resource meetings.</p>
<p>Conclusion</p>
<p>Diabetes educators will find the DiaBEATes Nurse Champion program useful
for structuring educational programs within various practice settings. The
case studies are useful tools for evaluating specific application of diabetes
knowledge.</p>
<p>Background</p>
<p>The nearly 24 million people with diabetes strain the health care system in
terms of resources and health care dollars. According to the American Diabetes
Association (ADA) a hospital stay for a patient with diabetes costs almost 3
times the stay of a patient without
diabetes.<sup><cross-ref type="bib" refid="ref1">1</cross-ref></sup> The
higher costs associated with caring for a patient with diabetes is partly
attributed to inadequate knowledge regarding current diabetes treatment
options and the failure of some health care workers to accept professional
responsibility for diabetes
management.<sup><cross-ref type="bib" refid="ref2">2</cross-ref>,<cross-ref type="bib" refid="ref3">3</cross-ref></sup></p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uplinger, N., Turkel, M. C., Adams, P. C., Nelson-Slemmer, D., Pierce, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709340804</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Development of a DiaBEATes Nurse Champion Program]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>726</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>713</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Tool Chest</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/731?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[New Therapeutic Horizons: Mapping the Future of Glycemic Control With Incretin-based Therapy]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/731?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>More than 24 million adults and children in the United States are living
with diabetes, and the vast majority of those individuals have type 2
diabetes. The clinical benefits of good glycemic control have been well
established. Most patients eventually require the use of multiple
hyperglycemic drugs in combination to approach or achieve the American
Diabetes Association's recommended target A1C value of 7%. The role of
incretin-based therapies for both glycemic control and &beta;-cell protection
has become an area of intense interest and development. Although current
practice guidelines do not include specific recommendations about when and how
to incorporate incretin-based agents, a consensus statement published by the
American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes
suggests the addition of a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist for
patients not at goal A1C with metformin and lifestyle changes. The goal of
this article is to review this class of agents, discuss their role in the
treatment of type 2 diabetes, and address the practical aspects of integrating
incretin-based agents into the management of patients with diabetes.</p>
<p>Conclusion</p>
<p>Currently, 3 incretin-based therapies are available and widely used in
clinical practice. Several more agents are either under review by the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) or are in the very late stages of development. For
diabetes educators trying to help their patients understand the differences
among their antidiabetic medications, a comprehensive understanding of these
agents and their role in therapy is imperative.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Campbell, R. K., Miller, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709342900</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[New Therapeutic Horizons: Mapping the Future of Glycemic Control With Incretin-based Therapy]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>747</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>731</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Pharmacy Update</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/752?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Assessing the Value of Diabetes Education]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/752?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of diabetes
self-management education/training (DSME/T) on financial outcomes (cost of
patient care).</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Commercial and Medicare claims payer-derived datasets were used to assess
whether patients who participate in diabetes education are more likely to
follow recommendations for care than similar patients who do not participate
in diabetes education, and if claims of patients who participate in diabetes
education are lower than those of similar patients who do not.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Patients using diabetes education have lower average costs than patients
who do not use diabetes education. Physicians exhibit high variation in their
referral rates to diabetes education.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>The collaboration between diabetes educators and physicians yields positive
clinical quality and cost savings. The analysis indicates that quality can be
improved, and cost reduced, by increasing referral rates to diabetes education
among low-referring physicians, specifically among men and people in
disadvantaged areas. More needs to be done to inform physicians about ways to
increase access to diabetes education for underserved populations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Duncan, I., Birkmeyer, C., Coughlin, S., Li, Q., Sherr, D., Boren, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709343609</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Assessing the Value of Diabetes Education]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>760</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>752</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/761?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of Diabetes Self-management Programs in Community Primary Care Settings]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/761?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of diabetes
self-management programs in real-world community primary care settings.
Estimates incorporated lifetime reductions in disease progression, costs of
adverse events, and increases in quality of life.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Clinical results and costs were based on programs of the Diabetes
Initiative of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, implemented in primary care
and community settings in disadvantaged areas with notable health disparities.
Program results were used as inputs to a Markov simulation model to estimate
the long-term effects of self-management interventions. A health systems
perspective was adopted.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>The simulation model estimates that the intervention does reduce discounted
lifetime treatment and complication costs by $3385, but this is more than
offset by the $15 031 cost of implementing the intervention and maintaining
its effects in subsequent years. The intervention is estimated to reduce
long-term complications, leading to an increase in remaining life-years and
quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
is $39 563/QALY, well below a common benchmark of $50 000/QALY. Sensitivity
analyses tested the robustness of the model's estimates under various
alternative assumptions. The model generally predicts acceptable
cost-effectiveness ratios.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Self-management programs for type 2 diabetes are cost-effective from a
health systems perspective when the cost savings due to reductions in
long-term complications are recognized. These findings may justify increased
reimbursement for effective self-management programs in diverse settings.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brownson, C. A., Hoerger, T. J., Fisher, E. B., Kilpatrick, K. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709340931</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cost-effectiveness of Diabetes Self-management Programs in Community Primary Care Settings]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>769</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>761</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/770?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Diabetes: Data From a Large Population-Based Study]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/770?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to examine the association between
cardiovascular risk factors and the presence of diabetes in a large
population-level dataset.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A secondary analysis was conducted using data from the 2007 Behavioral Risk
Factor Surveillance System, a population-based survey (n = 403,137) conducted
in the United States.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>The majority of the respondents were middle-aged and overweight.
Approximately half of the sample reported little or no physical activity.
Estimates from a logistic regression model for a weighted sample of white,
black, and Hispanic adults revealed that having hypertension or elevated
cholesterol was a strong predictor of diabetes even when controlling for age,
gender, race, education, income, body mass index, smoking status, and physical
activity.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>The results confirmed the importance of diabetes educators counseling
patients with hypertension or hypercholesterolemia about their increased risk
for developing diabetes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, K., Chasens, E. R., Sereika, S. M., Burke, L. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709338528</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Revisiting the Association Between Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Diabetes: Data From a Large Population-Based Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>777</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>770</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/778?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perception of Barriers to Self-care Management Among Diabetic Patients]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/778?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to explore individual, educational, and
system barriers that limit low-income diabetes patients' ability to achieve
optimal diabetes self-management.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Economically disadvantaged patients with diabetes who used the Diabetes
Clinic of Grady Health System in Atlanta, Georgia, participated in 3 focus
group discussions.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>The discussions were held with mostly African Americans (n = 35) to explore
barriers to achieving optimal diabetes self-management. Most participants were
not married, approximately one-third had less than high school level reading
skills, and 40% were not currently working. In terms of <I>individual
barriers,</I> the emotional toll from the diagnosis of and lifestyle changes
to treat diabetes was a recurrent theme, and included stress, frustration,
social isolation, interpersonal conflicts, depression, and fear. Denial was
often mentioned as the key factor that inhibited adherence to a healthy mode
of living. The <I>educational barriers</I> were failure to recognize the
risks and consequences of an asymptomatic condition. Many participants did not
understand A1C. Finally, several <I>system barriers</I> were identified. The
participants identified needed services, including follow-up and refresher
courses, support group discussions, nutrition and medication education,
availability of different education modalities, and expanded clinic hours.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>The focus group discussions identified both barriers to diabetes management
and opportunities for improving care for underserved patients with diabetes.
The results are useful to improve the delivery of care and to develop
quantitative studies to explore particular areas of interest. Based on these
results, the current system needs to provide more support and education to
patients with diabetes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gazmararian, J. A., Ziemer, D. C., Barnes, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709338527</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perception of Barriers to Self-care Management Among Diabetic Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>788</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>778</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/789?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Comparative Device Assessments: Humalog KwikPen Compared With Vial and Syringe and FlexPen]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/789?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to compare pen device-na&iuml;ve patients'
preferences for Humalog&reg; KwikPen<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> (insulin lispro injection) (Eli
Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN) to use of a vial and syringe and
FlexPen&reg; (insulin aspart injection) (Novo Nordisk A/S, Bagsvaerd,
Denmark).</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>This open-label, randomized, crossover 1-day study tested the hypotheses
that KwikPen was preferred to vial and syringe, and if this was found to be a
significant preference, that KwikPen was preferred to FlexPen. Accuracy of
doses prepared, ease of use via insulin device assessment battery, and
preference via insulin device preference battery were administered following
each pen evaluation, and a final preference question administered following
the evaluation of both pens. Clinical measures were not included as subjects
injected into an appliance to simulate the inje tion experience. Primary
outcome variables were evaluated by Question 13 of the insulin device
preference battery and the final preference question.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Among 232 enrolled patients randomized to 1 of 4 sequences (n = 58),
Humalog KwikPen was significantly preferred over vial and syringe and over
FlexPen. After patients were asked to assess Humalog KwikPen or FlexPen versus
V&amp;S by choosing "strongly agreed" or "agreed" to
the following attributes: easy to use, easy to hold in their hands when
injecting, and easy to press the injection button, the results exhibited
significant differences in patient responses. Humalog KwikPen was
significantly more accurate and was preferred to vial and syringe in
appearance, quality, discretion, convenience, public use, easy to learn, easy
to use, reliability, dose confidence, following insulin regimen, overall
satisfaction, and recommendation to others.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Humalog KwikPen was significantly preferred over vial and syringe and
FlexPen. When compared with vial and syringe, Humalog KwikPen and FlexPen were
easier to use and operate, demonstrated superior accuracy of doses prepared,
and preferred by pen-na&iuml;ve users.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ignaut, D. A., Schwartz, S. L., Sarwat, S., Murphy, H. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709340056</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Comparative Device Assessments: Humalog KwikPen Compared With Vial and Syringe and FlexPen]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>798</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>789</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nurse Satisfaction Using Insulin Pens in Hospitalized Patients]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate nurse satisfaction using pen
devices compared with vials/syringes to administer insulin to hospitalized
patients with diabetes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A quasi-experimental 1-group posttest only study design was utilized to
distribute a satisfaction survey to 54 registered nurses in a community
hospital after implementation of insulin pen devices from July 2005 to May
2006 on 2 medical-surgical floors. Nurses completed a voluntary, anonymous,
self-administered, postassessment, investigator-developed survey asking about
the number of years practiced as a nurse and experience administering insulin
to patients. The survey also asked about insulin administration satisfaction
questions comparing insulin pen devices to vials/syringes, and estimated time
to teach patients to self-inject insulin using either delivery method during
the study period.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>In comparison to vials/syringes, the majority of nurses agreed that insulin
pens were more convenient, simple and easy to use, and an overall improvement
compared with conventional vials/syringes. There were no insulin-related
needlestick injuries using the insulin pens and safety needles.</p>
<p>Conclusion</p>
<p>Nurses were satisfied with multiple aspects of insulin pens compared with
vials/syringes. Implementation of insulin pen devices does not increase
nursing time spent to teach patients to self-inject insulin and does not
increase insulin-related needlestick injuries.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Davis, E. M., Bebee, A., Crawford, L., Destache, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709340057</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nurse Satisfaction Using Insulin Pens in Hospitalized Patients]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>809</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/810?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Understanding Type 2 Diabetes: Including the Family Member's Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/810?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between
psychological and social factors and diabetes outcomes in people with type 2
diabetes and their family members.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A total of 153 patients with type 2 diabetes were assessed at a diabetes
outpatient clinic and postal questionnaires were sent to nominated family
members. The measures examined were diabetes knowledge, social support,
well-being, and illness perceptions.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>When compared with those with diabetes, family members reported lower
positive well-being and lower levels of satisfaction with support. They also
perceived diabetes as a more cyclical illness, which was controlled more by
treatment than by the individual. Family members also reported that the person
with diabetes was more emotionally distressed and knew more about diabetes
than the patient had actually reported himself or herself. There were no
differences between the family members of those in good or poor glycaemic
control.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>This study reinforces the importance of understanding social context and
illness beliefs in diabetes management. It also highlights the potential for
including family members in discussions and education about diabetes
management.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[White, P., Smith, S. M., Hevey, D., O'Dowd, T.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:12 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709340930</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Understanding Type 2 Diabetes: Including the Family Member's Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>817</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>810</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/818?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effect of Weight Reduction Interventions for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis From a Self-regulation Perspective]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/818?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The main purpose of this article was to investigate the value of a
self-regulation approach for weight reduction interventions in patients with
type 2 diabetes. In addition, the potentially moderating effect of other
intervention characteristics was explored.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>In a meta-analysis of 34 studies, overall effect sizes were calculated for
weight and A1C. The focus of the analysis was, however, on the moderating
effect of intervention characteristics, especially whether interventions that
score high on self-regulation produce stronger effects.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>The overall effect sizes (<I>d</I>) for weight loss in the short term
(&lt;6 months) were low and even lower in the longer term (&gt;6 months). The
overall effect sizes for A1C outcomes were higher and remained stable in the
longer term. Interventions that scored high on self-regulation characteristics
produced significantly better effects on both weight and A1C outcomes.
Furthermore, "goal reformulation" increased the effect on weight
outcomes whereas "emotion regulation" increased the effect on A1C.
With respect to the other intervention characteristics, only the
"inclusion of a patient's partner or relative" increased the
effect on weight loss.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>This meta-analysis underlines the importance of a self-regulation approach
for weight reduction interventions in diabetes patients, in particular, for
A1C outcomes. However, more research is needed to fully understand the
relationship among self-regulation, weight, and A1C.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Huisman, S. D., De Gucht, V., Dusseldorp, E., Maes, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709340929</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effect of Weight Reduction Interventions for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-analysis From a Self-regulation Perspective]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>835</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>818</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/836?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Knowledge About Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Prevention of African-American and Hispanic Adults and Adolescents With Family History of Type 2 Diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/836?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to assess type 2 diabetes knowledge,
perceptions, risk factor awareness, and prevention practices among African
American and Hispanic families with a history of diabetes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Ninth and tenth grade Houston area students who had a parent who spoke
English or Spanish and had a family history of type 2 diabetes were recruited.
Student interviews took place during lunch. Parents were interviewed via
telephone. Open-ended questions in the interview guide assessed knowledge of
diabetes and risk factors, diabetes prevention practices, and perceived risk.
Students reported dietary behaviors. Responses were recorded.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Interviews were conducted with 39 parents (95% female, 49%
African-American, 51% Hispanic) and 21 ninth and tenth grade adolescents (71%
female, 43% African-American, 57% Hispanic). The majority were overweight.
Approximately one-half of both groups reported some knowledge of diabetes. The
majority (74%) of parents correctly identified family history as a risk
factor, but few adolescents responded correctly. Being overweight was
identified as a risk factor by 26% of the parents and 10% of the adolescents.
Losing weight was not acknowledged as a way to reduce diabetes risk. Sweetened
beverage consumption consisted of 2 cans/day and 43% reported to have skipped
breakfast.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Overall, there was a lack of knowledge about risk and prevention of type 2
diabetes among African American and Hispanic families at risk. From a public
health perspective, there is a critical need for innovative prevention
programs targeting families at risk for diabetes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cullen, K. W., Buzek, B. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709341851</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Knowledge About Type 2 Diabetes Risk and Prevention of African-American and Hispanic Adults and Adolescents With Family History of Type 2 Diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>842</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>836</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/843?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Organizational Factors Associated With Self-management Behaviors in Diabetes Primary Care Clinics]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/843?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this article is to examine the relationship between
organizational characteristics as measured by the Chronic Care Model (CCM) and
patient self-management behaviors among patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>The study design was cross-sectional. The study setting included 20 primary
care clinics from South Texas. The sample included approximately 30
consecutive patients that were enrolled from each clinic for a sample of 617
patients. For the data collection procedures, the CCM survey was completed by
caregivers in the clinic. Self-management behaviors were obtained from patient
exit surveys. For measures, the CCM consisted of 6 structural dimensions: (1)
organization support, (2) community linkages, (3) self-management support, (4)
decision support system, (5) delivery system design, and (6) clinical
information systems. Patient self-management behavior included whether the
patient reported always doing all 4 of the following behaviors as they were
instructed: (1) checking blood sugars, (2) following diabetes diet, (3)
exercising, and (4) taking medications. For data analyses, to account for
clustering of patients within clinics, hierarchical logistic regression models
were used.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Self-management support was positively associated with medication
adherence, while decision support system was positively associated with
exercise and all 4 self-management behaviors. Surprisingly, community linkages
were negatively associated with medication adherence, while clinical
information system was negatively associated with diet and all 4 behaviors. A
total score, including all dimensions, was positively associated with only
exercise.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Health care providers and diabetes educators in primary care clinics should
consider how organizational characteristics of the clinic might influence
self-management behaviors of patients. The focus should be on better access to
evidence-based information at the point of care and self-management needs and
activities.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaissi, A. A., Parchman, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709342901</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Organizational Factors Associated With Self-management Behaviors in Diabetes Primary Care Clinics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>850</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>843</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/851?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and Safety of Medication Adjustments by Nurse Case Managers to Control Hyperglycemia]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/5/851?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and effectiveness of
implementing standing orders for nurse case managers to adjust
antihyperglycemic medications.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A retrospective cohort design was used to assess outcomes in American
Indian and Alaska Native people who received case management and medication
adjustment and those who received only standard primary care. Patients with
diabetes and evidence of keeping regular follow-up appointments for diabetes
care (N = 2345) who all had baseline A1C &ge; 7.0% were divided into 3
mutually exclusive groups for analysis: (1) those seen only by primary care
providers (PCP; n = 1574); (2) those seen by nurse case managers (NCM; in
addition to primary care) for diabetes education services only (n = 711); and
(3) those who, in addition to a PCP and NCM visit, had medications adjusted by
the nurse case managers (MA; n = 60). Outcome variables were number of visits
with documentation of hypoglycemia (safety) and rate of A1C change
(effectiveness).</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Documented hypoglycemia occurred more frequently with more intensive
treatment. The MA group experienced the greatest rate of hypoglycemic events.
The difference in hypoglycemia incidence between the groups was significant,
but the number of events was small. Glycemic control improved most rapidly in
the MA group, even after adjusting for potentially confounding variables.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>In this setting, hypoglycemia occurs infrequently in all groups, but at
higher rates with more intensive treatment. Nurse case management, whether
with or without medication adjustment, is effective in improving short-term
glucose control.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Curtis, J., Lipke, S., Effland, S., Dickinson, B., McCabe, A., Russell, B., Russell, M., Bloomquist, P., Wilson, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709343677</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Effectiveness and Safety of Medication Adjustments by Nurse Case Managers to Control Hyperglycemia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>856</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>851</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/857?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nutrition and Diet]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/5/857?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:29:13 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nutrition and Diet]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>5</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>859</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>857</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Industry Update</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/523?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AADE's 36th Annual Meeting and Exhibition 2009: Exploring New Dimensions in Atlanta, GA]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/523?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fain, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:16 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AADE's 36th Annual Meeting and Exhibition 2009: Exploring New Dimensions in Atlanta, GA]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>523</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>523</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Editorials</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/529?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AADE Guidelines for Diabetes Education Answer Questions in a Changing Health Care Environment]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/529?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Draheim, M. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AADE Guidelines for Diabetes Education Answer Questions in a Changing Health Care Environment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>530</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>529</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>From the President</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/532?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[AADE News]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/532?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[AADE News]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>543</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>532</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>AADE News</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/547?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Looking Ahead]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/547?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Looking Ahead]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>548</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>547</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Looking Ahead</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/555?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[2009 EXHIBITION PREVIEW (AS OF May 22, 2009): August 5-8 {middle dot} Atlanta, Georgia]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/555?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[2009 EXHIBITION PREVIEW (AS OF May 22, 2009): August 5-8 {middle dot} Atlanta, Georgia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>562</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>555</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/565?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology for Personal Use: An Educational Program That Educates and Supports the Patient]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/565?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this article is to describe the development and
implementation of an educational program for the initiation of real-time
continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) technology for personal use, not 3-day
CGMS<SUP><SMALL><SMALL>TM</SMALL></SMALL></SUP> diagnostic studies. The education program was designed to meet the
needs of patients managing their diabetes with either diabetes medications or
insulin pump therapy in an outpatient diabetes education center using a
team-based approach.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Observational research, complemented by literature review, was used to
develop an educational program model and teaching strategies. Diabetes
educators, endocrinologists, CGM manufacturer clinical specialists, and
patients with diabetes were also interviewed for their clinical observations
and experience.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>The program follows a progressive educational model. First, patients learn
in-depth about real-time CGM technology by attending a group presensor class
that provides detailed information about CGM. This presensor class facilitates
self-selection among patients concerning their readiness to use real-time CGM.
If the patient decides to proceed with real-time CGM use, CGM initiation is
scheduled, using a clinic-centered protocol for both start-up and
follow-up.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Successful use of real-time CGM involves more than just patient enthusiasm
or interest in a new technology. Channeling patient interest into a structured
educational setting that includes the benefits and limitations of real-time
CGM helps to manage patient expectations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Evert, A., Trence, D., Catton, S., Huynh, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709335467</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Continuous Glucose Monitoring Technology for Personal Use: An Educational Program That Educates and Supports the Patient]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>580</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>565</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Tool Chest</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/581?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Perspectives for Practice: Translating Estimated Average Glucose (eAG) to Promote Diabetes Self-management Capacity]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/581?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this article is to facilitate translation of the Consensus
Statement to practice for diabetes educators and other professionals who
contribute to the care of individuals with diabetes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>The 2007 Consensus Statement from the American Diabetes Association (ADA),
European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD), International
Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC), and
International Diabetes Federation (IDF) called for the standardization of
glycated hemoglobin measurement in reporting and use of average glucose values
in clinical practice.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Conversion of glycated hemoglobin percentage to average blood glucose was
anchored historically in early laboratory techniques linked to disease
outcomes rather than to definitive laboratory standardization. Recently, the
A1C-Derived Average Glucose (ADAG) study demonstrated that A1C values can be
accurately expressed as estimated average glucose (eAG) and endorsed eAG as
the best way to standardize the expression of laboratory values of glycated
hemoglobin.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Adoption of the 2007 Consensus Statement will influence clinical practice
and decision making and subsequently influence self-management for individuals
with diabetes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rentfro, A. R., McEwen, M., Ritter, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709338222</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Perspectives for Practice: Translating Estimated Average Glucose (eAG) to Promote Diabetes Self-management Capacity]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>594</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>581</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Today's Educator</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/596?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Randomized Comparison of the Terms Estimated Average Glucose Versus Hemoglobin A1C]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/596?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that using
estimated average glucose (eAG) while instructing patients yields better
knowledge retention than using the term hemoglobin A1C (A1C).</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Patients with diabetes who had poor baseline understanding of A1C
(determined by a 4-question survey) were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: A1C or
eAG. Depending on randomization, providers discussed patients' current status
and personal targets for glycemic control using either the term A1C or
estimated average glucose. Patients had a telephone survey 3&ndash;4 weeks
later, assessing change in knowledge of glycemic control.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>The 80 participants who completed follow-up had similar baseline
characteristics, including poor understanding of A1C and poor recall of
previous A1C values. At the 3&ndash;4 week follow-up, average score for each
survey question improved significantly in both groups, with mean composite
score increasing in the A1C group by 32% and in the eAG group by 33%. There
was no suggestion of a difference in degree of improvement between groups.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Patients previously unfamiliar with the meaning of A1C, using either term
(A1C or eAG) resulted in an equal improvement in knowledge. Within this study,
eAG was not a more understandable term, or an easier concept for patients to
remember. Further research is needed to test whether use of the term A1C
should be replaced by eAG.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brick, J. C., Derr, R. L., Saudek, C. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709336298</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Randomized Comparison of the Terms Estimated Average Glucose Versus Hemoglobin A1C]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>602</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>596</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/603?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Structured Educational Program Improves Metabolic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/603?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>To evaluate the effectiveness of a structured education group program in
metabolic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A randomized controlled trial was conducted in a public teaching hospital
and tertiary care center. Participants were 104 patients with type 2 diabetes
not using insulin (aged 59 &plusmn; 9.5 years, diabetes duration of 10.5
&plusmn; 6.70 years, 53% women) randomized to attend an 8-hour structured
group education program (delivered in 4 sessions, for 4 weeks, by a trained
nurse educator) or to usual care. A pretest and posttest assessed the
patients' knowledge before and after the course. The main outcome measures
were A1C, weight, blood pressure, and lipids at 4-month intervals, up to 12
months.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>A1C levels decreased significantly in the intervention group after the 4th
month and remained lower than in the control group until the 12th month
(multivariate analysis of covariance, with baseline A1C as a covariate).
Weight, blood pressure levels, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein
levels improved significantly, and similarly, in both groups.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>A structured education group program centered in self-management improves
the glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, reaching the peak
effect at 4 months, and lasting for up to 12 months.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scain, S. F., Friedman, R., Gross, J. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709336299</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Structured Educational Program Improves Metabolic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>611</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>603</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/612?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Making Diabetes Education Accessible for People With Visual Impairment]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/612?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to identify changes needed to make the
diabetes education materials and programs of the Diabetes Association of
Greater Cleveland (DAGC) accessible for people who have visual impairment and
diabetes (PVID).</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Using the principles and techniques of participatory action research (PAR),
5 PVID and 4 staff members of a local diabetes association met once a month
for a year to plan, implement, and evaluate progress toward full accessibility
of all diabetes education materials and programs. The researcher served as
facilitator.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Four "transformational moments" are presented through which the
PAR process enabled PVID and diabetes professionals to learn to understand and
trust each other. Changes made to increase accessibility included production
of 2 recordings for providing access to print information about diabetes;
planning public education program publicity and locations for access;
development of guidelines to help speakers make their diabetes education
presentations accessible for people who cannot see slides and gestures; and
presentation of an inservice for the entire staff of the diabetes association,
including information about how they live with visual impairment, and common
courtesies that make communication with PVID more effective.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Diabetes education programs should include planning for full accessibility
for PVID. Diabetes organizations should publish teaching materials in
accessible format.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Williams, A. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709335005</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Making Diabetes Education Accessible for People With Visual Impairment]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>621</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>612</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/622?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patient Activation Is Associated With Healthy Behaviors and Ease in Managing Diabetes in an Indigent Population]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/622?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study is to assess the validity of the patient
activation construct as measured by the Patient Activation Measure (PAM)
survey by correlating PAM scores with diabetes self-management behaviors,
attitudes, and knowledge in a predominantly minority and uninsured
population.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A convenience sample of patients presenting to an urban public hospital
diabetes clinic was surveyed and contacted by phone 6 months later. The survey
included questions about activation, health behaviors, and health care
utilization.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>A total of 287 patients agreed to participate. Most were African American,
female, and uninsured. Most respondents (62.2%) scored in the highest category
of activation according to the PAM. Activated patients were more likely to
perform feet checks, receive eye examinations, and exercise regularly.
Activation was consistently associated with less reported difficulty in
managing diabetes care but not with A1C knowledge. PAM scores at the initial
interview were highly correlated with scores at 6-month follow-up. Activation
level did not predict differences in health care utilization during the 6
months following the survey.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Higher scores on the PAM were associated with higher rates of self-care
behaviors and ease in managing diabetes; however, the indigent urban
population reported higher activation scores than found in previous studies.
The relationship between activation and outcomes needs to be explored further
prior to expanding use of this measure in this patient population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rask, K. J., Ziemer, D. C., Kohler, S. A., Hawley, J. N., Arinde, F. J., Barnes, C. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709335004</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patient Activation Is Associated With Healthy Behaviors and Ease in Managing Diabetes in an Indigent Population]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>630</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>622</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/631?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Slowly Digestible Carbohydrate Sources Can Be Used to Attenuate the Postprandial Glycemic Response to the Ingestion of Diabetes-Specific Enteral Formulas]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/631?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study is to compare the glycemic and insulinemic
responses following the ingestion of recently developed diabetes-specific
enteral formulas versus a standard and a high-fat formula.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>Fifteen type 2 diabetes patients were selected to participate in a
randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Two enteral formulas (47 energy
percent [En%] carbohydrate, 34En% fat, and 4 g fiber/200 mL) were defined with
either isomaltulose (formula 1) or sucromalt (formula 2) as the main
carbohydrate source. For comparison, an isoenergetic diabetes-specific,
high-fat (33En% carbohydrate, 50En% fat, 2.9 g fiber/200 mL) and a standard
formula (55En% carbohydrate, 30En% fat, 2.8 g fiber/200 mL) were tested.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Ingestion of formulas 1 and 2 and the high-fat formula resulted in an
attenuated blood glucose response when compared with the standard formula
(<I>P</I> &lt; .05). In accordance, peak plasma glucose concentrations were
significantly lower when compared with the standard formula (189 &plusmn; 3.6
mg/dL [10.5 &plusmn; 0.2 mmol/L], 196.2 &plusmn; 3.6 mg/dL [10.9 &plusmn; 0.2
mmol/L], 187.2 &plusmn; 3.6 mg/dL [10.4 &plusmn; 0.2 mmol/L], and 237.6
&plusmn; 3.6 mg/dL [13.2 &plusmn; 0.2 mmol/L], respectively). Plasma insulin
responses were lower after consumption of the newly developed and high-fat
formulas. Ingestion of the high-fat formula resulted in a greater postprandial
triglyceride response (<I>P</I> &lt; .05).</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Diabetes-specific enteral formulas rich in slowly digestible carbohydrate
sources can be equally effective in attenuating the postprandial blood glucose
response as low-carbohydrate, high-fat enteral formulas without elevating the
plasma triglyceride response.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanschoonbeek, K., Lansink, M., van Laere, K. M. J., Senden, J. M. G., Verdijk, L. B., van Loon, L. J. C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709335466</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Slowly Digestible Carbohydrate Sources Can Be Used to Attenuate the Postprandial Glycemic Response to the Ingestion of Diabetes-Specific Enteral Formulas]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>640</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>631</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/641?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Community-Based Peer-Led Diabetes Self-management: A Randomized Trial]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/641?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of a
community-based diabetes self-management program comparing treatment
participants to a randomized usual-care control group at 6 months.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A total of 345 adults with type 2 diabetes but no criteria for high A1C
were randomized to a usual-care control group or 6-week community-based,
peer-led diabetes self-management program (DSMP). Randomized participants were
compared at 6 months. The DSMP intervention participants were followed for an
additional 6 months (12 months total). A1C and body mass index were measured
at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. All other data were collected by
self-administered questionnaires.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>At 6 months, DSMP participants did not demonstrate improvements in A1C as
compared with controls. Baseline A1C was much lower than in similar trials.
Participants did have significant improvements in depression, symptoms of
hypoglycemia, communication with physicians, healthy eating, and reading food
labels (<I>P</I> &lt; .01). They also had significant improvements in
patient activation and self-efficacy. At 12 months, DSMP intervention
participants continued to demonstrate improvements in depression,
communication with physicians, healthy eating, patient activation, and
self-efficacy (<I>P</I> &lt; .01). There were no significant changes in
utilization measures.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>These findings suggest that people with diabetes without elevated A1C can
benefit from a community-based, peerled diabetes program. Given the large
number of people with diabetes and lack of low-cost diabetes education, the
DSMP deserves consideration for implementation.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorig, K., Ritter, P. L., Villa, F. J., Armas, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709335006</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Community-Based Peer-Led Diabetes Self-management: A Randomized Trial]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>651</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>641</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/652?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Self-instructional Program for Diabetes Educators on Preconception Counseling for Women With Diabetes]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/652?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The purpose of this study was to develop, implement, and evaluate the
effectiveness of a self-instructional preconception counseling (PC) training
program for Certified Diabetes Educators (CDEs) to enhance PC knowledge and
self-efficacy.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>A 1-group, pre-post test study was conducted with 31 CDEs from a large
medical center in western Pennsylvania. The self-instructional program
included selected readings, such as the American Diabetes Association's
position statement on PC of women with diabetes and an interactive CD-ROM,
"Reproductive-Health Awareness for Teenage Women With Diabetes"
("READY-Girls"). Paper-and-pencil knowledge and self-efficacy
questionnaires regarding PC and pregnancies of women with diabetes were
completed by the CDEs before and immediately following the self-instructional
program. Upon completion, participants received 5.0 Continuing Nursing
Education contact hours (CNEs) from the State Nurses Association.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Prior to receiving the program, all of the participants indicated they
would benefit from further training on PC. Pretest knowledge scores averaged
in the 70th percentile; following the program, the participants significantly
increased (<I>P</I> &lt; .01) PC knowledge and self-efficacy in providing PC
to women with diabetes, including adolescents.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Although CDEs knew relevant information, they lacked some specific
knowledge about PC, and they lacked confidence in their knowledge and in their
ability to counsel patients. Diabetes educators can benefit from an education
program to provide PC to their female patients, including adolescents.
Computer or Web-based accessibility could make this a low-cost and easily
disseminated program.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cothran, M. M., Sereika, S. M., Fischl, A. R., Schmitt, P. L., Charron-Prochownik, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709334516</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Self-instructional Program for Diabetes Educators on Preconception Counseling for Women With Diabetes]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>656</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>652</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/657?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A National Study of the Diabetes Educator: Report on a Practice Analysis Conducted by the National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/4/657?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Purpose</p>
<p>The practice analysis described in this report was conducted by the
National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators (NCBDE) to (1) provide a
basis for documenting the continuing validity of the Certification Examination
for Diabetes Educators, (2) define new areas that should be assessed in future
certification examinations, and (3) ensure that the content of certification
examinations is related to practice.</p>
<p>Methods</p>
<p>The study involved developing a diabetes educator job task list and survey,
distributing 4103 surveys, and analyzing survey responses from a
multidisciplinary and geographically representative sample of certified
diabetes educators.</p>
<p>Results</p>
<p>Eight hundred thirty-six surveys were suitable for analysis, with relevant
demographic subgroups adequately represented. Based on survey data, an
examination matrix and detailed content outline was constructed that will be
used by NCBDE to assemble future test forms.</p>
<p>Conclusions</p>
<p>Certification examination specifications were developed directly related to
the important activities that diabetes educators perform. Future forms of the
certification examination will continue to be matched to job-related,
criterion-referenced test specifications and will have strong evidence of
content validity. Future forms of the exam will contain 200 items at specified
cognitive levels with a representative sampling of tasks within 3 core areas
from the detailed content outline.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zrebiec, J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1177/0145721709336300</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A National Study of the Diabetes Educator: Report on a Practice Analysis Conducted by the National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>663</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>657</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Features</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/664?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Diabetes and Men's Health]]></title>
<link>http://tde.sagepub.com/cgi/reprint/35/4/664?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 10:09:17 PDT</dc:date>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Diabetes and Men's Health]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>American Association of Diabetes Educators</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>4</prism:number>
<prism:volume>35</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>667</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2009-07-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>664</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Industry Update</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>